[Date Prev][Date Next]
My, that's helpful. Had I googled rather than used the list search
page on openldap.org (with it's 'glimpse index not found' error), I
would have found the many old discussions of this topic.
-- On Dec 4, 8:00am, "Pierangelo Masarati" wrote:
> Subject: Re: integerOrderingMatch
> > Since integerOrderingMatch isn't yet implemented in 2.0.x (according to
> > schema_init.c), I thought I'd use caseExactOrderingMatch. Is this the
> > accepted ordering rule for integer data in 2.0.x?
> > Best,
> > Andrew
> If you accept that 2 is greater than 1000 then yes.
> Pierangelo Masarati
-- End of excerpt from "Pierangelo Masarati" --
firstname.lastname@example.org Unix Systems Group UC, Riverside