[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:23:55 +0100
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <1041.168.91.2.45.1005659944.squirrel@mail.ivy.tec.in.us>
References: <3BF01535.2070305@emperative.com> <1041.168.91.2.45.1005659944.squirrel@mail.ivy.tec.in.us>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.23i

Previously John Madden wrote:
> And with that said, ignoring all NIS stuff, yes, you should be able to setup
> Samba/TNG (I don't think the main branch supports ldap yet) with openldap to
> do authentication, and nss_ldap or pam_ldap (see padl.com - they're not
> supported here) for system-level authentication and file ownership.

Samba can do PAM.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

References:
- RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: "Will Sarka" <wsarka@emperative.com>
- Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
  - From: "John Madden" <jmadden@ivy.tec.in.us>

Prev by Date: backend speed of berkeley db compared to mysql
Next by Date: Re: RFC [Samba/NIS + LDAP]
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread