[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: planning an ldap db
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> here are owned by an "umbrella" company, I put them all in the same tree, it
> hasn't really caused any problems. Also I don't like "uid=" DN's, I prefer
> "cn=" so that accounts are simply attributes of people, and people without
> accounts can exists in the same part of the tree. But that's just me.
I thought about putting them to the same tree but that gave me same headache as
I didn't know what to make the tree to look like.
Should I create groups like "company1 finance", "company 2 finance" and so on..?
Or what does your tree look like?
One can use uid's without relating them to accounts...? Just a way to give
people an unique identifier (as people might have the same common name).