[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Stranges in databases, searches and mysterious dies...
- To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: Stranges in databases, searches and mysterious dies...
- From: Turbo Fredriksson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: 10 May 2000 13:09:54 +0200
- In-reply-to: email@example.com's message of "Wed, 10 May 2000 06:37:44 -0400 (EDT)"
- Organization: LDAP expert wannabe
- References: <E12pTsF-00025Hfirstname.lastname@example.org>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) Emacs/20.6
> On 10 May, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > Quoting email@example.com:
> >> On 9 May, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> >> > Did so a couple of times, didn't help. I think the problem (?) was
> >> > that the DB was to big. See the second update at the end of my mail...
> >> What backend are you running (GNU db, Sleepycat db) and version.
> I do believe the Sleepycat db (formerly Berkley db) is recommended and
> it's what I'm running here. I'm not sure if your issue is the backend
> or in openldap itself however.
What is the difference between the Sleepycat and the GNU db exactly? Why
would it make any difference? Is sleepycat faster or what?
> > GNU db, version I don't know. It came from libc6...
> >> If you compress the ldif file, I'll try it locally.
> > Same URL, just ending with .gz
> Can't find it at http://www.bayour.com/DebianDatabase.ldif.txt.gz (I did
> try several variations on it too)
Please try again, I didn't have enough space on the FS to compress it...