[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Two ldbm instances

To: Kenneth MacDonald <kenny@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Two ldbm instances
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 08:36:24 -0700
Cc: Chris Zimmerman <czimmer@voicecommander.com>, "openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <871zhnz43d.fsf@penguin.ucs.ed.ac.uk>
References: <"Kurt D. Zeilenga"'s message of "Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:08:58 -0700"> <3.0.5.32.19990413110858.009cbea0@localhost>

At 03:09 PM 4/14/99 +0100, Kenneth MacDonald wrote:
>That URL doesn't mention a "-n" option, neither does the manual page
>with my local openldap 1.2.0 installation.

It's a documentation bug which will be fixed in the next release.
The ldif2ldbm has accepted '-n 2' to built the second database
for quite sometime.

References:
- Re: Two ldbm instances
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: Two ldbm instances
  - From: Kenneth MacDonald <kenny@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Two ldbm instances
Next by Date: Problems with set up and connection...?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread