Re: Fw: How useful is oracle internet directory server?

["Mark Wilcox" <mark@mjwilcox.com>]

This would kind of be the wrong way to go. A directory is not an RDBMS so it
shouldn't support the same functionality.

What you're asking for (and it's a good idea) is a an open standard for
communicating with a RDBMS. Most people think that's SQL, but SQL is only
useful after you've connected to the database. There still is not a true
open standard to a RDBMS. The closest things we have are ODBC (which is just
because MS shipped with every copy of Windows and is still primarily a
Windows only protocol), Java's JDBC and Perl's DBI.

If you had a true open RDBMS database protocol, then you could talk more
sensibly about which to use (e.g. LDAP or RDBMS protocol) for an application
instead of trying to fit an RDBMS into LDAP.

Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold Shore <ashore@stginc.com>
To: giovanni.baruzzi@allianz-leben.de <giovanni.baruzzi@allianz-leben.de>;
Bharat Tewari <tewari@wipinfo.soft.net>
Cc: Open-LDAP General <openldap-general@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 6:39 AM
Subject: RE: Fw: How useful is oracle internet directory server?


>I would add that as LDAP usage grows into an enterprise infrastructure
>element, then its widening use will be facilitated by making available the
>SQL functions that are inherent to rdbms's.  My view is that it's a sign of
>maturation.
>
>Or, as my grandmother might have said, "Paradigm, schmaradigm - it works
>OK!"
>
>Arnold Shore
>Annapolis, MD
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-openldap-general@OpenLDAP.org
>[mailto:owner-openldap-general@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Giovanni
>Baruzzi
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 7:11 AM
>To: Bharat Tewari
>Cc: Open-LDAP General
>Subject: Re: Fw: How useful is oracle internet directory server?
>
>
>
>
>Bharat Tewari wrote:
>
>>  >>>>
>> <?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller>Hi
>> I just read somewhere that oracle has come out with Internet directory
>> server where basically its the open ldap server code and the backend
>> database is oracle. Now as per my understanding, the RDBMS and
>> directory service are two different paradigms so what exactly is the
>> advantage oracle is going to get with this move?
>
>Sure RDBMS and LDAP are very distant.
>But wer have so many RDBMS applications that we want to use and we don't
>have neither time or money to rewrite them completely, that every chance
>in integration is welcomed.
>The fact that the data repository of LDAP lies in the same Database as
>my application greatly enhances the possiblities of intergration. One
>can think of stored procedures to maintain application tables while
>updating LDAP or retrieving "Legacy Data" while accessing LDAP.
>
>>
>> Secondly how ldap and e-commerce are related?
>
>LDAP is infrastrucutre that you need to collect the data about your
>customers, their authentication, their rights, their settings.
>
>
>
>> Can somebody give me a good pointer on various e-commerce products
>> that use ldap and how does the relational database as a backend
>> advantageous(if it is!!).
>
>I have no pointers.
>About RDBMS: they are a very good way to organize data in tables. Is a
>mature technology and today very effective.
>We need data in tables; LDAP would not be the ideal solution here.
>
>
>> If anyone of you is planning on this direction and can throw some
>> light without violating patents, copyrights or confidentiality it
>> would be really helpful to me.
>> Thx
>> bharat
>> <?/smaller><?/fontfamily>
>> <<<<
>>
>>
>
>My 0.5 cents
>
>Giovanni Baruzzi
>
>
>