[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ITS#8286 continued

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, openldap-devel@openldap.org
Subject: Re: ITS#8286 continued
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:32:33 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <b23ac549-6675-e8b2-c2d9-5f9a821c99be@symas.com>
References: <30137D175B0CB26C944EDAB8@[192.168.1.39]> <b23ac549-6675-e8b2-c2d9-5f9a821c99be@symas.com>

--On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 7:28 PM +0100 Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:

for the matching rule.  Anyone have an opinion for caseIgnoreMatch
being better?


Looks like the values are schema keywords, they should be caseIgnoreMatch.


Great, thanks!

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>

References:
- ITS#8286 continued
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Re: ITS#8286 continued
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ITS#8286 continued
Next by Date: RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread