[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: 2.4.14 prerelease call for testing #2
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Howard Chu wrote:
Agreed. But at this point, 2.4.14 is such an improvement over .13 that
I'd rather get it out instead of delay it further. We can revisit this
for .15 when we get some better traces of the problem.
So I was about to write my "I agree" e-mail, but I caught:
1347 assert( !syn->ssyn_validate( syn, si->si_ctxcsn+i ));
see https://www.nbcs.rutgers.edu/~richton/test050fail.200902142000 for
backtrace.