[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Please test RE_24

Aaron Richton wrote: 
I'm definitely playing whack-a-mole with varying, intermittent failures
here. Look i.e.:

https://www.nbcs.rutgers.edu/~richton/richton-20071128-test039fail.tgz
[~310MB uncompressed]


Looking...

Aside from some problems with /usr/bin/awk in test020, all tests passed for me on Solaris 10 sparcv9. I'll try to compare my test039 logs with your tarball; seems like you had a failed Delete operation somewhere.

[...output was...]
Using ldapsearch to retrieve all the entries...
Filtering ldapsearch results...
Filtering original ldif used to create database...
Comparing filter output...
comparison failed - slapd-ldap search/modification didn't succeed
./scripts/test039-glue-ldap-concurrency failed (exit 1) 
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `bdb-yes'
Current working directory /free/BUILD/openldap-20071127/tests
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test'
Current working directory /free/BUILD/openldap-20071127/tests
gmake: *** [test] Error 1

And I know that 039 *can* succeed from my 050 failure (must have gotten
past it at one point)...

note, I did a cvs diff, don't see any RE24 changes since last night's
build.

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Howard Chu wrote:

Aaron Richton wrote: 
I had one core dump overnight, but I couldn't reproduce it under a memory
debugger, so I just decided to run the whole suite again.

sparcv9 test050 is dead in the water; I copied off the testrun directory
and snapped core files just in case.
Strange, test050 passed on my Solaris10 sparcv9 system. 
I'll make a fresh checkout and try again...

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Aaron Richton wrote:

Succeeded on Fedora 8 x86_64; I will run Solaris sparcv7/sparcv9
overnight.


--
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/