[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: dITStructureRules/nameForms in subschema subentry for informational purpose

On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:

Kurt Zeilenga wrote:

On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:

Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on an idea
of Steve:

Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in OpenLDAP's TODO.

In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in slapd.conf
and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for informational
purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in


One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules... (server wide instead of subtree specfication wide).

So you're voting against the approach suggested above?

No. Above you say "without enforcing them". I suggest "with enforcing them",
as ditContentRules are (if instantiated).

-- Kurt