[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: dITStructureRules/nameForms in subschema subentry for informational purpose
On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on
Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in
In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in
and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for
purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in
One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules...
(server wide instead of subtree specfication wide).
So you're voting against the approach suggested above?
No. Above you say "without enforcing them". I suggest "with
as ditContentRules are (if instantiated).