[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: dITStructureRules/nameForms in subschema subentry for informational purpose

Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on an idea
>> of Steve:
>> Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in OpenLDAP's TODO.
>> In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in slapd.conf
>> and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for informational
>> purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in
>> slapd.conf.
>> Opinions?
> One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules...
> (server wide instead of subtree specfication wide).

So you're voting against the approach suggested above?

Ciao, Michael.