[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: slurpd in RE24
--On Thursday, April 05, 2007 1:17 PM -0700 Howard Chu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The relevant thread is:
If they are wrong, then so much the better. :)
That person was talking about plain syncrepl, not assisted via back-ldap.
Oh. When they said they'd read the threads about "push" based syncrepl, I
made the assumption they were talking about using it with back-ldap, since
I don't know how else you'd get push based syncrepl. In any case, I vote
to purge slurpd.
Senior Systems Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html