[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slurpd in RE24

--On Thursday, April 05, 2007 1:17 PM -0700 Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:

The relevant thread is:


If they are wrong, then so much the better. :)

That person was talking about plain syncrepl, not assisted via back-ldap.

Oh. When they said they'd read the threads about "push" based syncrepl, I made the assumption they were talking about using it with back-ldap, since I don't know how else you'd get push based syncrepl. In any case, I vote to purge slurpd.


-- Quanah Gibson-Mount Senior Systems Software Developer ITS/Shared Application Services Stanford University GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html