[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDIF parser performance

Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Try this one instead, I've cleaned up most of that cruft.

Congratulations! Any chance to see this soon in RE23?

The ldapadd code path is solid. The ldapmodify code path is a bit more questionable, mostly because of the ambiguities in the RFC. Let's see what other feedback we get from testing in HEAD...

It's *much* faster:

real    0m1.651s
user    0m1.144s
sys     0m0.104s

instead of:

real    1m31.305s
user    1m29.730s
sys     0m0.360s

Ciao, Michael.


  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/