[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP Transactions

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: LDAP Transactions
From: "Marc Boorshtein" <mboorshtein@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:11:08 -0500
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B2YJw8GZhobMxnLkDXAwkPkSyX4/9rB2NqZpRFi+DmiEvbg6yNiSi+3sW303niRyzOmoqvtIOA3Agr5ha+4nUC9GKY/y4paQlQG3+2R755giM0/2Gzr7khOfnH6V1C3tLatyzBBzaOCjlWuv0tFJe5vnXLVUkUnBVl8LwTHVnnI=
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.0.20060306115510.038cb2f8@OpenLDAP.org>
References: <7.0.1.0.0.20060306115510.038cb2f8@OpenLDAP.org>

A couple of thoughts:

1.  I don't see anything mentioned about Isolation of searches.  In a
transaction, if I modify an entry on one connection, other connections
should not see that transaction until it is commited while converselly
if I have started a transaction on my connection and I have performed
a modify operation on an entry then on a search I should see that
modification.

2.  I don't think limmiting transactions to 1 "session" per connection
is un-reasonable.  I think most applications use LDAP connections in a
pool with one connection per thread.

Marc

References:
- LDAP Transactions
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: LDAP Transactions
Next by Date: Re: LDAP Transactions
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread