[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ITS#3950

HEAD/re23 thr_posix.c match.  That is, the patch suggested in
ITS#3950 was never applied to HEAD nor RE23.  IIRC, Howard
reworked portions of slapd(8) so as not rely so heavily on
thread yielding.  It's quite possible that some of these
changes haven't found there way into RE23.


At 11:00 AM 1/5/2006, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>I would suspect that if ITS#3950 was a problem in 2.3.13+, it
>would also be a problem with 2.3.11.  But I note that some of
>the reports indicate no problem with 2.3.11 but problems with
>2.3.13+.  Of course, there might be other factors involved.
>I've reopened the ITS and clarified its notes to indicate that
>the fix (or I should say the "our workaround for what could be
>considered a pthread implementation bug") is not in RE23
>as opposed to the issue not being in RE23.
>At 10:21 AM 1/5/2006, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>Any particular reason why the fix to this issue, which *is* present in 2.3, contrary to the notes in the ITS, isn't in OL 2.3? :)  I'm guessing this is what is causing the large scale reporting of "performance problems" on the software list.  Maybe a quick 2.3.16 release?
>>Quanah Gibson-Mount
>>Principal Software Developer
>>ITSS/Shared Services
>>Stanford University
>>GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html