[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Run-time registered controls
At 08:35 AM 1/25/2005, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>>>To keep things simple,
>>>Of course, I might be missing a much cleaner and simpler solution, or
>>>overlooking other side effects...
>> I guess I don't see what functionality we're missing.
>See above. We didn't notice this earlier because the run-time registered
>controls either required the control to be non critical (ppolicy) or
>required/allowed it to be non-critical (syncrepl).
Right, test019 would have erroneously failed before if the
sync control was critical.
So, yes, we do need a way for overlays to augment the
controls supported by a database instance.