[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slapd.8

At 02:12 AM 2002-11-25, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
>Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>> Fixed in HEAD; I don't see any reason not to include it in 2.1.9.
>> Next time, you may want file an ITS to be able to keep track
>> of the status of your issue.
>Thanks, I will. Speaking of 2.1, we are currently providing packages
>only for 2.0, but are preparing packages for 2.1 at the moment (default
>will still be the 2.0 branch though). In how far do you think 2.1 is
>ready for general usage?

Given that 2.1 is a release, by definition, it is available
for "general use". http://www.openldap.org/faq/index.cgi?file=225

In chats with committers and others, 2.1 likely will be
marked "stable" soon.