[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slapd.8

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Fixed in HEAD; I don't see any reason not to include it in 2.1.9.
> Next time, you may want file an ITS to be able to keep track
> of the status of your issue.

Thanks, I will. Speaking of 2.1, we are currently providing packages
only for 2.0, but are preparing packages for 2.1 at the moment (default
will still be the 2.0 branch though). In how far do you think 2.1 is
ready for general usage?


Roland Bauerschmidt