[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: current C API draft.
ldap.h claims to support draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-04.txt and not
draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-05.txt , the last version of the draft.
After reading the two drafts I did not catch any differences ( maybe I
should have read more carefully ), but why not change the supported
version to 05?
Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
As 2.x moves forward, I think we should aim for compatibility
with our existing implementation (of a LDAPext LDAP C API
I-D). Those who want RFC 1823/U-Mich LDAP compatibility should
use OpenLDAP 1.x.
With the number of issues fixed in 2.0, I don't believe anyone should be
encouraged to use the 1.x series.