[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: current C API draft.

At 03:11 PM 2002-04-15, Kervin Pierre wrote:
>Maybe as we move forward, we should aim to maintain 1823 compatibility functions?

As 2.x moves forward, I think we should aim for compatibility
with our existing implementation (of a LDAPext LDAP C API
I-D).  Those who want RFC 1823/U-Mich LDAP compatibility should
use OpenLDAP 1.x.

If and when another alternative becomes available, we'll
consider it.