[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: back-bdb quirk?
Oh... I also justed noticed it in the new code.
I'll also do some more testing.
Jong Hyuk Choi
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center - Enterprise Linux Group
P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
(phone) 914-945-3979 (fax) 914-945-4425 TL: 862-3979
Pierangelo Masarati <email@example.com>@e32.esmtp.ibm.com on
03/20/2002 01:45:36 PM
Sent by: firstname.lastname@example.org
To: Jonghyuk Choi/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc: email@example.com, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: back-bdb quirk?
Jonghyuk Choi wrote:
> Pierangelo, increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE worked in your case ?
> buf[BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE] of bdb_idl_insert_key can overflow while running
> Although I'm also not 100% sure whether increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE
> solves the problem,
> we seem to need a better management of IDL in memory.
> - Jong
Spoke too early: BDB_IDL_MULTI was defined, so BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE
is not used. I'll see if I can do some more testing tomorrow.
I can add up to 200k entries in one shot with slapadd now.
Dr. Pierangelo Masarati | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale | fax: +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano |
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy |