[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-bdb quirk?

Oh... I also justed noticed it in the new code.
I'll also do some more testing.
- Jong

Jong Hyuk Choi
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center - Enterprise Linux Group
P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
email: jongchoi@us.ibm.com
(phone) 914-945-3979    (fax) 914-945-4425   TL: 862-3979

Pierangelo Masarati <masarati@aero.polimi.it>@e32.esmtp.ibm.com on
03/20/2002 01:45:36 PM

Sent by:    masarati@e32.esmtp.ibm.com

To:    Jonghyuk Choi/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:    hyc@highlandsun.com, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Subject:    Re: back-bdb quirk?

Jonghyuk Choi wrote:
> Pierangelo, increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE worked in your case ?
> buf[BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE] of bdb_idl_insert_key can overflow while running
> bdb_idl_fetch_key().
> Although I'm also not 100% sure whether increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE
> solves the problem,
> we seem to need a better management of IDL in memory.
> - Jong

Spoke too early: BDB_IDL_MULTI was defined, so BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE
is not used.  I'll see if I can do some more testing tomorrow.
I can add up to 200k entries in one shot with slapadd now.


Dr. Pierangelo Masarati               | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale                | fax:   +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano                 |
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy   |