[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-bdb quirk?

To: Jonghyuk Choi <jongchoi@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: back-bdb quirk?
From: Pierangelo Masarati <masarati@aero.polimi.it>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:45:36 +0100
Cc: hyc@highlandsun.com, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Organization: Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale
References: <OF5B095238.2E868D58-ON05256B82.004DE60E@pok.ibm.com>

Jonghyuk Choi wrote:
> 
> Pierangelo, increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE worked in your case ?
> 
> buf[BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE] of bdb_idl_insert_key can overflow while running
> bdb_idl_fetch_key().
> Although I'm also not 100% sure whether increasing BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE directly
> solves the problem,
> we seem to need a better management of IDL in memory.
> 
> - Jong

Spoke too early: BDB_IDL_MULTI was defined, so BDB_IDL_DB_SIZE
is not used.  I'll see if I can do some more testing tomorrow.
I can add up to 200k entries in one shot with slapadd now.

Pierangelo.

-- 
Dr. Pierangelo Masarati               | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale                | fax:   +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano                 |
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy   |
http://www.aero.polimi.it/~masarati

References:
- Re: back-bdb quirk?
  - From: "Jonghyuk Choi" <jongchoi@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: back-bdb quirk?
Next by Date: Re: back-bdb quirk?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread