Re: schema check

[Pierangelo Masarati <masarati@aero.polimi.it>]

> >#   Used in conjunction with 'extensibleObject'
> >#   in 'cn' it holds the name of the subsystem it is monitoring
> >objectclass ( TBD
> >        NAME 'monitor'
> >        DESC 'OpenLDAP system monitoring'
> >        SUP top
> >        MUST ( cn )
> >        STRUCTURAL
> >        )
> 
> Another alternative would be to have:
> 	( TBD NAME 'monitor'
> 	DESC 'OpenLDAP system monitoring'
> 	MUST cn ABSTRACT )
> 
> in the system schema (schema_prep.c), and then to construct
> all the STRUCTURAL classes for each type of monitor entry,
> and associated monitor attributes, in monitor.schema.
> 
> This alternative approach may make checking system schema easier.

But this means each monitor entry should have a special STRUCTURAL
objectclass; maybe this might be 'subentry' ?

Pierangelo.