[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: SOCKET handling and Netscape SDK bug(?)
At 10:25 AM 7/27/00 +0200, Mikael Grehn wrote:
>"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>> At 11:25 AM 7/26/00 +0200, Mikael Grehn wrote:
>> >> Can you repeat the problem using code as provided? Your version
>> >> appears not to be functionally equivalent to that in the HEAD
>> >> branch or the OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2 branch.
>> >Well I'm using experimental code in openLdap2.0-alpha3 on NT. I am using
>> >Lotus Notes 5.0.1b (release nov. 1999).
>> Like I said, can you use either HEAD branch or OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2
>> code, or at least openldap-2.0-beta?
>No I cant since the whole package has been updated heavily and it would take
>several weeks for me to update openLDAP2.0-alpha4.
I'm not asking you to make any changes. I'm asking you to
test and provided feedback using code as it provided.
>I will download that package
>and try to find differentces that could solve the problem. I guess
>openLDAP2.0-alpha4 is the latest (best) package ported to NT to compare with?
No, HEAD branch is the latest, followed by OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2.
The openldap-2.0-beta tarball is a last resort if you cannot
obtain sources via AnonCVS.
>> I'll defer looking into details until you update. I can
>> clearly see that from the code fragment you provide that
>> changes have been made since -alpha3 which likely would
>> resolve this problem.
>Ok I will compare with later versions but unfortunately I cannot exchange the
>whole package. :-(