[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: phonetic

To: Mark Adamson <adamson@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: phonetic
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:31:42 -0700
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.0.20000724103957.00b10e70@infidel.boolean.net>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.96L.1000724132650.22330l-100000@nil.andrew.cmu. edu> <4.3.2.7.0.20000724084050.00b14370@infidel.boolean.net>

At 10:56 AM 7/24/00 -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>Second, we'll have to sort out how to "attach" the rule to specific
>attribute types.  I was thinking of doing this by associating
>an (optional) approx rule with each equality rule.  Then
>when the attribute specified use of the equality rule, it would
>automatically pick up the associated approx rule.  I'll see if
>I can find time to fix up the framework to support such.

I've updated the framework to support association of a approximate
matching rule with an equality matching rule.  This is quite
experimental (given that no matching rule codes have been written).

Kurt

References:
- Re: phonetic
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: phonetic
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: phonetic
Next by Date: Re: phonetic
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread