[Date Prev][Date Next]
At 10:56 AM 7/24/00 -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>Second, we'll have to sort out how to "attach" the rule to specific
>attribute types. I was thinking of doing this by associating
>an (optional) approx rule with each equality rule. Then
>when the attribute specified use of the equality rule, it would
>automatically pick up the associated approx rule. I'll see if
>I can find time to fix up the framework to support such.
I've updated the framework to support association of a approximate
matching rule with an equality matching rule. This is quite
experimental (given that no matching rule codes have been written).