[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.0-devel fails "make test"?

At 08:42 PM 9/2/99 -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>At 12:59 PM 9/3/99 +1000, David J N Begley wrote:
>>Expected at this time (whilst CVS is in flux)?
>I think that was a whoops on my part.  I must have committed
>a piece of code which demonstrates particular problem we have in
>the new dn2id subtree indices.  I recommitted the code which
>masks the problem so folks can continue other development
>efforts (while I and others continue to track down the problem
>with dn2id subtree indices).
>More eyeballs are of course welcomed...  just backout rev
>1.39 from back-ldbm/dn2id.c...

Thanks to Hallvard's eagle sharp eyes, the bug I introduced in has
been squashed.