[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: support for dynamically loadable modules (ITS#196)
We can avoid some of the problem by making extensive use of the dynamically
loadable modules, and limiting the number of symbols that are
exported/visible from each module. But yeah, a naming czar is probably not a
> I'm thinking that we are also going to have to do more
> about namespaces consumed by slapd, tools, each module,
> and various libraries. Looks like it might we wise
> to have someone systematically go through the code
> (library by library, module by module, application
> by application) and rename symbols appropriately...
> Guess we need a "naming czar" and plus a couple of
> sed'ers to go to town on this. Volunteers welcomed.