[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Really Weird Problem
At 05:11 PM 1/4/99 -0000, Jon Parry-McCulloch wrote:
> Like what?
> The things I mentioned below.
Then why not use OpenLDAP 1.1.2? It includes the DB2 changes.
> Updates to the configure system and util-int.c were made
> weekend to ease this issue. Previously -devel configure
> checked for the existance of ctime_r and not it's prototype.
> Will thee changes to gonfig be mirrored in the CVS repository yet,
>as config seems not to be checking my header files.
The changes were committed on Saturday. They still may be problematic.
As I said before, the reentrancy/thread-safe changes are quite young.
> The linker itself core dumped? or a specific application.
> The linker. I told you it was weird.
Sounds like a bug in your linker! :-)
> The DB2 changes (ldbm_dataum_init and cursor changes) are in
> Why do you need the ldif changes? (ldif routines are not
> When I copied over the files that included the cursor change and the
>ldbm_datum_init() function the vbersions I had also had the ldif names
>changed and it was easier just to tweak the code locally rather than locate
>the revision that contained the init() function only. maybe I screwed up.
Merging -devel changes into release engineering 1.1 sources
is non-trivial and cannot be done (in general) by copying whole