Re: (ITS#8229) ldapsearch: report failed search results to stderr even when ldif == 0

[ryan@nardis.ca]

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote:
>We should be wary of changing ldapsearch output, since
>people parse it in scripts.

Good point. Adding a stderr message to the existing stdout message would 
safer. Still not as safe as no change, of course.

>I do find the output quirky and would have liked it different.
>Maybe yet another option could clean it up, or an -o flag similar
>to ldif-wrap.

Yet another option... :)