Re: (ITS#6549) test043 hasSubordinates attribute inconsistencies

[mhardin@symas.com]

> Hi Ando. I've tested on RHEL 4/5 x86 and all seems good. I'll test on =
Windows in a little while.

Back-ported to 2.4.22 and tested in Windows. Works.

-Matt

>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> -Matt
>=20
> On May 17, 2010, at 6:27 PM, masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>>> Indeed, syncprov_operational() is right: it duplicates the entry =
only if
>>> contextCSN is already present in the entry, and thus may need to be
>>> updated.  What's wrong is back-bdb, which gives up when the entry =
does not
>>> have e_private set appropriately, while it could do more to find out =
about
>>> the entry's subordinates.  This may explain why in some cases the
>>> attribute is present.  This occurs whenever contextCSN is not =
already
>>> present in the entry.  I'm preparing a fix for back-bdb.
>>=20
>> Fixed in HEAD; please test.  Thanks, p.
>>=20
>=20