[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6549) test043 hasSubordinates attribute inconsistencies
Hi Ando. I've tested on RHEL 4/5 x86 and all seems good. I'll test on =
Windows in a little while.
On May 17, 2010, at 6:27 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> Indeed, syncprov_operational() is right: it duplicates the entry only =
>> contextCSN is already present in the entry, and thus may need to be
>> updated. What's wrong is back-bdb, which gives up when the entry =
>> have e_private set appropriately, while it could do more to find out =
>> the entry's subordinates. This may explain why in some cases the
>> attribute is present. This occurs whenever contextCSN is not already
>> present in the entry. I'm preparing a fix for back-bdb.
> Fixed in HEAD; please test. Thanks, p.