[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#6549) test043 hasSubordinates attribute inconsistencies

Hi Ando. I've tested on RHEL 4/5 x86 and all seems good. I'll test on =
Windows in a little while.



On May 17, 2010, at 6:27 PM, masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:

>> Indeed, syncprov_operational() is right: it duplicates the entry only =
>> contextCSN is already present in the entry, and thus may need to be
>> updated.  What's wrong is back-bdb, which gives up when the entry =
does not
>> have e_private set appropriately, while it could do more to find out =
>> the entry's subordinates.  This may explain why in some cases the
>> attribute is present.  This occurs whenever contextCSN is not already
>> present in the entry.  I'm preparing a fix for back-bdb.
> Fixed in HEAD; please test.  Thanks, p.