[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#6151) Update cosine.schema to RFC 4524
On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Michael Str=F6der wrote:
> Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 1:34 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>> Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>>>> obsoletes !=3D OBSOLETE, so no. That is, the meaning of the term
>>>> 'obsolete' is quite different in these two contexts.
>>>> The latter context the term is defined as follows: The OBSOLETE =
>>>> present, indicates the element is not active.
>>> I agree that OBSOLETE should not be set in this case.
>>>> For user application attribute types, whether the type is active or =
>>>> I think, best left to the schema administrator.
>>> Who is the schema administrator?
>> Generally speaking, the OpenLDAP admin administrates which schema =
>> to load into the schema and whether each such element is active and
> What does "active and inactive" mean exactly? Does that include =
> OBSOLETE keyword in schema files? I hope not...
The purpose of the OBSOLETE (inactive) flag is to support transition =
away from a particular schema element. Basically, if one no longer =
wants to use the attribute type 'x' in their directory, they should 1) =
mark x as inactive in the subschema, 2) then remove all uses of x, 3) =
then remove x from the subschema.
The directory prevents all non-removal updates to inactive elements, =
allowing 2 to be well performed.
>> While in some cases a schema admin might design schema elements, I =
>> schema admin and schema element designer to be two separate roles.
>>> I'm nitpicking here because on the OpenLDAP
>>> lists we all keep telling OpenLDAP admins not to mess with the =
>>> at all.
>> We often advise admins to load various schema elements into their =
> The role for loading the shipped schema files is not the question =
>> When at I say "don't mess with standard schema elements", what I mean =
>> don't change aspects of schema specifications which are consider per =
>> technical specifications to be immutable on published in a technical
>> specification (or otherwise broadly published).
> Does "immutable" include OBSOLETE? I hope so...
OBSOLETE is one of the mutable properties of a schema element (because =
otherwise it couldn't support local movements away from arbitrary schema =
> Ciao, Michael.