[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#5451) syncprov_checkpoint deadlock bugfix?
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, email@example.com wrote:
> Does this help? From my fiddling with ITS#5340 (REP_ENTRY_MODIFIABLE).
> I do not understand syncprov's handling of REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE though.
> (For one thing it seems to assume that REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE is set if
> and only if rs.sr_entry->e_private != NULL. Which is possibly true with
> back-bdb but seems a shaky assumption in general.)
I have found out how to reliably reproduce this bug in our master server,
and it definitely involves syncprov. I'm now working on reproducing it
in a minimalistic test configuration, I'll try your patch there and report