[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#4845) Back-perl is non working
>> No surprise that such a careful redesign resulted, as a side
>> effect, in a stricter compliance with RFC2589. The fact that
>> nobody complained up to now indicates that strict adherence to
>> specs usually helps in code portability.
> Yeah. But I didn't know that RFC2589 is used inside back_<whatever>.
> Now I am aware of that and I really thanks about your help and your
> kindness to take some time to find where my error was.
I think he meant RFC2849, which is the LDIF specification.
> Maybe a little not in slapd-perl man page that entry sent to openldap
> have to conform to RFC2589 should be a point to avoid such loss of time.
The slapd-perl(5) man page says that it expects LDIF entries to be
returned. As such, it is already a given that they must actually conform
to the LDIF spec.
> Thanks again, and this bug is closed for me.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/