[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#3835) Lightweight Listener Thread
--On Friday, July 08, 2005 8:13 PM -0400 Sang s Lim <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I'm not particularly interested in testing with a large number of idle
>> connections. The solution to idle clients is the idletimeout setting in
>> slapd.conf. I'd have to figure out how to set up a large number of idle
>> connections as well.
> A simple socket program which establishes TCP connections to slapd without
> sending subsequent LDAP requests will work for the experiment with a
> number of idle connections.
>> I was hoping this patch was more designed at increasing throughput
> Even though this patch only aims at responsive and resilient improvement,
> I think it is an important issue as you can see in the following link.
> This patch may relieve the problem posted in the link.
I can see how it might help relieve the problem in that post, although I'm
not sure if I would call the patch more responsive (where I define that as
a betterment in getting results). Definately more resilient, in that
connections will be accepted (if not acted upon).
> BTW, I'm also looking into throughput improvement. So I hope a throughput
> improvement patch
> is provided soon.
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: