[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: memory alignment errors (ITS#2760)
Fixed in HEAD, please test.
At 06:56 PM 10/9/2003, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>Thanks; make test appears much better now. I tried a new compile using
>'long' (int is 32 bits on Solaris LP64; long is 64.) Every time I run with
>that change, things are good until test 17 (syncreplication-refresh),
>which always fails with the message:
>"test failed - master and slave databases differ"
>This is running against HEAD, so I realize I may be looking at a work in
>progress. Is that test currently expected to pass?
>I noticed Kurt's follow-up about using a union. If somebody thinks there's
>a better fix, I'd be willing to try it.