[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: bug/typo in RFC2256?]
If you have issues regarding the LDAP technical specification,
I suggest you take them to the IETF LDAPbis WG. LDAPbis is
specifically chartered to revise the LDAP technical specification.
At 03:54 AM 2002-07-04, Fotis Georgatos wrote:
>This is only FYI.
>I have the impression that some LDAP implementations can get confused
>and "hide" data within the double-defined preferredDeliveryMethod attribute.
>BTW. The same attribute is also double in objectclass "residentialPerson"
>----- Forwarded message from Fotis Georgatos <email@example.com> -----
>Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:41:57 +0200
>From: Fotis Georgatos <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: bug/typo in RFC2256?
>Dear Mark et al,
>while investigating the organizationalRole objectclass,
>through the nice web interface at http://ldap.akbkhome.com,
>I found, to my surprise, "preferredDeliveryMethod" being defined twice.
>I traced it back and saw that it is defined in RFC2256, exactly as such.
>It is even a SINGLE-VALUE field, which means that it has to be corrected.
>Even the default OpenLDAP's schemas have it like this,
>so I presume the rest of the LDAP world has now to fix this minor typo...
>----- End forwarded message -----