[Date Prev][Date Next]
[firstname.lastname@example.org: bug/typo in RFC2256?]
This is only FYI.
I have the impression that some LDAP implementations can get confused
and "hide" data within the double-defined preferredDeliveryMethod attribute.
BTW. The same attribute is also double in objectclass "residentialPerson"
----- Forwarded message from Fotis Georgatos <email@example.com> -----
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:41:57 +0200
From: Fotis Georgatos <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: bug/typo in RFC2256?
Dear Mark et al,
while investigating the organizationalRole objectclass,
through the nice web interface at http://ldap.akbkhome.com,
I found, to my surprise, "preferredDeliveryMethod" being defined twice.
I traced it back and saw that it is defined in RFC2256, exactly as such.
It is even a SINGLE-VALUE field, which means that it has to be corrected.
Even the default OpenLDAP's schemas have it like this,
so I presume the rest of the LDAP world has now to fix this minor typo...
----- End forwarded message -----