[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: contrib/876 (ITS#876)
At 04:41 PM 5/8/01, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>saw that you were about to go 2.0.8 but that my case was suspended.
>nis.schema doesn't work well without the mailmember (which is required),
>and which my/Luke's patch addresses.
>Well, you noted "RFC?" in the notes:
>Should give you all the gory details. I simply added the component
>required to "finish" nis.schema without fully generating this separate
I'll add the two elements to misc.schema which holds experimental