[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Floating point Syntax & Matching rules (ITS#745)
I know this message is old but... I seem to be in need of the real data
type to store and return records based on geo-location data.
Any progress on this? is the patch still available somewhere (the link
provided is no longer valid)?
At 00:57 16/09/2000 +0000, Kurt@OpenLDAP.org wrote:
>At 12:00 AM 9/16/00 +0000, june@ISI.EDU wrote:
> >I ftped it yesterday. I modified pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/schema_init.c
> >and the patch name is june-000914.patch.
>Okay. For others: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/pub/incoming/june-000914.patch
> >Can you elaborate more about the specification, i.e. what kind of
> >format, where I put it, etc...
>I assume you intent to define an LDAP syntax for the ASN.1
>primitive type REAL. As such a syntax would be generally
>useful, the specification should be eventually published as
>an RFC. So, I recommend you format your specification as such.
>In fact, I encourage you to submit an Internet Draft to the
>IETF. Your first draft can be rough. The IETF has guidelines
>available for I-D authors at:
>You might also scan the archives of the IETF LDAPext WG
>for prior work or interest in this area. OpenLDAP maintains
>a browsable archive of this IETF list at:
>In fact, see:
>I wouldn't think such an I-D would take too long to write.
>I suggest leveraging an existing textual representation
>of real numbers (from IEEE or ISO) and just stating use
>of this. In fact, you likely can borrow from:
> >I also have a question about the oids. I selected
> >22.214.171.124.4.1.14126.96.36.199.59 for the Float syntax.
>You can not "select" or otherwise assign an OID which
>doesn't belong to you.
> >Is it ok or should I select the oid that I have a control on?
>In the specification, do not specify one (yet). Just define
>the OID as:
> ( <TBD> DESC 'string syntax for ASN.1 REAL' )
>After the specification matures, an appropriate OID can be
>selected by the authors as directed by the IETF/IESG. This
>may be a privately assigned OID, may end up being one
>previously allocated for this purpose, or may come from
>various OID arcs used for such things.
>For development purposes, I'd be willing to assign an OID
>for this (as such is general purpose syntax) out of our
>experimental OID arc. We arc allows "evolving
>specifications". That is, we don't assign new OIDs upon
>each I-D revision... and we ALWAYS replace the OID prior
>to "publication" of the reference specification (e.g. RFC).