[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ldbmcat bug (ITS#211)
Michael,
You're patch appears to be reverse patch that backs out, in part,
the previous ldbmcat changes. I believe the current ldbmcat is
actually correct; however, I've forward this note to our resident
BerkeleyDB developer.
Kurt
http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/tools/Attic/ldbmcat.c?hideattic=1&only_on_branch=OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2
1.3.2.4.2.2 Fri Mar 26 21:31:40 1999 UTC; 4 months, 3 weeks ago by kdz
CVS Tags: OPENLDAP_RELEASE, OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2_6, OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2_5,
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2_4, OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2_3, OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2_2,
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2_1, OPENLDAP_STABLE; Branch: OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_1_2
Changed since 1.3.2.4.2.1: +8 -0 lines
Diffs to 1.3.2.4.2.1 (colored diff) ; Diffs to 1.11 (colored diff)
Apply ldbmcat patch suggested in ITS#85.
Devel needs to be patched separately. Ksp working on changes.