Re: [ldapext] Status of X.500 based Access Control for LDAP

[Steven Legg <steven.legg@eb2bcom.com>]

Hi Ersin,

Ersin ER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May I please learn the status of X.500 based Access Control for LDAP? Is 
> there anybody working on it, any drafts?

I have three expired drafts relating to X.500 access control for LDAP:

    draft-legg-ldap-admin-03.txt
    draft-legg-ldap-acm-admin-04.txt
    draft-legg-ldap-acm-bac-04.txt

You should still be able to find copies of them online, but if you have
trouble finding them let me know and I'll send them to you. I think the
drafts are complete with respect to X.501 (2005) but I would need to update
the boilerplate before progressing them further. Also, Kurt Zeilenga wanted
me to incorporate the content of RFC 3672 (Subentries in LDAP) into
draft-legg-ldap-admin-xx.txt, but I haven't done that yet.

Regards,
Steven

> At Apache Directory Project we already have a working subsystem which is 
> almost identical to the one in the X.501 (2005) spec. So I (and my 
> colleagues) would like to initiate or contribute to such a work.
>
> Any pointers or more detailed information are welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Ersin ER
> http://people.apache.org/~ersiner/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eersiner/>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> Ldapext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext