> > OK, if we're going to actually discuss this seriously... This is going > about the problem the completely wrong way. It is impractical in most cases > and impossible in many cases for a particular master to determine when an > update has reached every shadow copy. That is valuable feedback - if major vendors aren't able to implement waiting for shadow copies then the nfsv4 folks must either use something other than LDAP for volume location or change their requirements. Cheers Leif
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext