[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal

To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:52:45 +0200
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org, Ldapext list <ldapext@ietf.org>, Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@isode.com>
Delivered-to: ldapext@core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <48CFE313.50205@isode.com>
References: <6B4DC086-C4AF-49CA-B31F-2794FBBCD8B6@Isode.com> <BE9B544D-AF86-44C4-993F-4DFE44154403@Isode.com> <hbf.20080916l19s@bombur.uio.no> <48CFE313.50205@isode.com>

Alexey Melnikov writes:
>Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>> One question about the WG charter: Stick to features with existing
>> implementations, or consider significant new invention, or leave
>> that choice open?
>
> I would think that the choice is open at the moment. If you have some
> suggestions (in either category), now would be a good time to mention them.

No, just curious at the moment.  Workflow and results can be rather
different for the two.

-- 
Hallvard
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

References:
- Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
  - From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
- Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
  - From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
Next by Date: Re: [ldapext] updating LDIF [RFC2849]
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread