[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal

To: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:47:15 +0100
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org, Ldapext list <ldapext@ietf.org>, Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@isode.com>
Delivered-to: ldapext@core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <hbf.20080916l19s@bombur.uio.no>
References: <6B4DC086-C4AF-49CA-B31F-2794FBBCD8B6@Isode.com> <BE9B544D-AF86-44C4-993F-4DFE44154403@Isode.com> <hbf.20080916l19s@bombur.uio.no>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:

>Kurt Zeilenga writes:
>  
>
>>Amongst other factors in determining whether to approve this BOF,
>>they will need to be convinced that there is sufficient level of
>>participation in the BOF and the proposed WG.
>>    
>>
>I'd participate in the WG's mailinglist and hopefully some WG meeting,
>but probably not this BOF.
>
>One question about the WG charter: Stick to features with existing
>implementations, or consider significant new invention, or leave
>that choice open?
>  
>
I would think that the choice is open at the moment. If you have some 
suggestions (in either category), now would be a good time to mention them.

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

References:
- Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
  - From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
- Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
Next by Date: Re: [ldapext] IETF#73 LDAP BOF Proposal
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread