[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

[ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt

To: John McMeeking <jmcmeek@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:16:42 +0100
Cc: ldapext@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <OF72A40A60.D5A5C2D5-ON86256DD0.00449117-86256DD0.0046727C@us.ibm.com>
References: <OF72A40A60.D5A5C2D5-ON86256DD0.00449117-86256DD0.0046727C@us.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)

John McMeeking wrote:


I feel that numsubordinates should return 0 when hassubordinates would
return FALSE.  Since hassubordinates can include subentries,
numsubordinates should also.


Ok, I agree with that.

Ciao, Michael.


_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

References:
- Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt
  - From: John McMeeking <jmcmeek@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread