[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt
- To: Jim Sermersheim <jimse@novell.com>
- Subject: Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt
- From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:27:40 +0100
- Cc: ldapext@ietf.org
- In-reply-to: <sf9e2718.033@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
- References: <sf9e2718.033@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Jim Sermersheim wrote:
Right, when people on this thread are talking about subentries, they are
talking about subentries in the X.500 subentry sense of the word (like
subschema subentry, prescriptiveACI subentry, etc).
Then I ask again for use-case(s) of counting these kind of subentries in
`numSubordinates'.
Ciao, Michael.
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext