[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [ldapext] I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldap-uuid-00.txt
- To: John McMeeking <jmcmeek@us.ibm.com>
- Subject: Re: [ldapext] I-D ACTION:draft-zeilenga-ldap-uuid-00.txt
- From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 08:58:52 -0700
- Cc: ldapext@ietf.org
- In-reply-to: <OFC6EEB028.C5A870D3-ON86256D25.0049EB29-86256D25.004BF994@ us.ibm.com>
At 06:49 AM 5/13/2003, John McMeeking wrote:
>2.3 'uuidOrderingMatch' Matching Rule
>
>Why do you define an ordering matching rule for UUIDs?
For completeness. UUID ordering was discussed in the DCE
UUID specification.
I wonder though if the ordering applies to non-DCE UUID
forms allowed by my draft (I need to buy a copy of the ISO
specification) and, even if so, whether a DSA can be
reasonably expected to commit objects in UUID order.
Anyways, I wanted some discussion before deciding whether
or not to support UUID ordering matching here and that's
easier to do with a specification for it.
So, I ask, should UUID ordering support stay or be removed
from this I-D?
Kurt
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext