[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] Majordomo results: Japanese girl VS playboy

To: Ed Reed <eer@OnCallDBA.COM>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Majordomo results: Japanese girl VS playboy
From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ldapext@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <sce18e96.053@REED>

> I thought moving LDAPEXT to a moderated list was supposed to help with
> this, but it looks like things are no better (at least).

I don't believe it is a moderated list, it is merely a different address 
than the widely abused @netscape one.

> Any ideas what to do next?

I think the only way to reduce the spam significantly is to permit posting 
only to subscribers, which implies approving subscribers, and having a way 
to approve any on-topic posts by non-subscribers (per IETF rules).  Ie, a 
human to do this work.  Any volunteers?

 - RL "Bob"



_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

Follow-Ups:
- [ldapext] reducing spam on the LDAPEXT list
  - From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)

References:
- Re: [ldapext] Majordomo results: Japanese girl VS playboy
  - From: "Ed Reed" <eer@OnCallDBA.COM>

Prev by Date: [ldapext] Mail sent to IPoverIB
Next by Date: Re: [ldapext] Majordomo results: Japanese girl VS playboy
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread