[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: subentries comments

To: Rob Byrne - Sun Microsystems <robert.byrne@sun.com>
Subject: Re: subentries comments
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 07:21:23 -0800
Cc: steven.legg@adacel.com.au, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <3C10939C.5EB41791@sun.com>
References: <001101c17eca$dd5085e0$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au>

At 02:02 AM 2001-12-07, Rob Byrne - Sun Microsystems wrote:
>I understand your goal in this draft is to just get the x500 functionality
>into LDAP and that's ok.  The thing that concerns me is how easy it will be
>subsequently to make extensions (or whatever) that in my opinion will make
>subentries that are good for LDAP, notably the filter and retrieval points
>I've been making.

I believe that such extensions can easily be made but are more
appropriately defined in separate documents.

Kurt

References:
- RE: subentries comments
  - From: "Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
- Re: subentries comments
  - From: Rob Byrne - Sun Microsystems <robert.byrne@sun.com>

Prev by Date: RE: subentries comments
Next by Date: why didnt you come watch me like you said you would?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread